RewindexOutage eventsMay 9, 2023
GitHub outage, May 9, 2023
5 vendors posted 4 incidents between 11:00 and 23:00 UTC, against about 30 incidents from 20 vendors in the same hours on an ordinary week. 2 vendors named GitHub in 1 incidents (2 of them blamed it). GitHub posted “Incident with Pull Requests” at 08:07 UTC.
Observed, not verified. A line means a vendor’s incident named another vendor, or started in the same window. It is not a proven cause.
Times are UTC; lags are from when GitHub posted (08:07).
- GitHub posted 08:07
How it spread
Vendors that named GitHub, grouped by when they posted, and vendors that blamed one of the vendors GitHub took down. Solid lines: the vendor named the other. Dashed: same window, not named.
Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.
Mermaid source
flowchart LR
root["GitHub<br/>posted 08:07 UTC"]:::root
h4["1 to 4 hours later<br/>2 vendors, 2 blamed GitHub<br/>v0, Vercel"]:::blames
root --> h4Vendors that named GitHub
In their own words. “Blames” means a causal phrase sits next to the name (“due to”, “upstream provider”…).
1 to 4 hours later
1 vendor
- Major incident
+3 h 45 min
Blames GitHub
v0and VercelGitHub Service Outage: Upstream Integrations Failing
…GitHub Service Outage: Upstream Integrations Failing This incident has been resolved.…
Same window, did not name anyone
3 incidents started during the event without naming GitHub or another vendor. Some are part of it, some are a normal day’s background (about 30 in these hours).
Show all 3
- +3 h 12 minMinor incident
- +3 h 28 minMinor incident
- +3 h 47 minMinor incident
Detected automatically from 6 status pages opening incidents in the peak hour (normally at most 5). Mentions are matched by name in each incident’s title and updates, then classified as cause, location or integration; quoted text is the vendor’s. Vendors that share one status page are shown once.